SameSite cookies explained

Secure your site by learning how to explicitly mark your cross-site cookies.

Rowan Merewood
Rowan Merewood

Cookies are one of the methods available for adding persistent state to web sites. Each cookie is a key=value pair along with a number of attributes that control when and where that cookie is used. You've probably already used these attributes to set things like expiry dates or indicating the cookie should only be sent over HTTPS. Servers set cookies by sending the aptly-named Set-Cookie header in their response. For all the detail you can dive into RFC6265bis, but for now here's a quick refresher.

Say you have a blog where you want to display a "What's new" promo to your users. Users can dismiss the promo and then they won't see it again for a while. You can store that preference in a cookie, set it to expire in a month (2,600,000 seconds), and only send it over HTTPS. That header would look like this:

Set-Cookie: promo_shown=1; Max-Age=2600000; Secure
Three cookies being sent to a
    browser from a server in a response
Servers set cookies using the Set-Cookie header.

When your reader views a page that meets those requirements, i.e. they're on a secure connection and the cookie is less than a month old, then their browser will send this header in its request:

Cookie: promo_shown=1
Three cookies being sent from a
    browser to a server in a request
Your browser sends cookies back in the Cookie header.

You can also add and read the cookies available to that site in JavaScript using document.cookie. Making an assignment to document.cookie will create or override a cookie with that key. For example, you can try the following in your browser's JavaScript console:

> document.cookie = "promo_shown=1; Max-Age=2600000; Secure"
< "promo_shown=1; Max-Age=2600000; Secure"

Reading document.cookie will output all the cookies accessible in the current context, with each cookie separated by a semicolon:

> document.cookie;
< "promo_shown=1; color_theme=peachpuff; sidebar_loc=left"
Javascript accessing cookies within the
JavaScript can access cookies using document.cookie.

If you try this on a selection of popular sites you will notice that most of them set significantly more than just three cookies. In most cases, those cookies are sent on every single request to that domain, which has a number of implications. Upload bandwidth is often more restricted than download for your users, so that overhead on all outbound requests is adding a delay on your time to first byte. Be conservative in the number and size of cookies you set. Make use of the Max-Age attribute to help ensure that cookies don't hang around longer than needed.

What are first-party and third-party cookies?

If you go back to that same selection of sites you were looking at before, you probably noticed that there were cookies present for a variety of domains, not just the one you were currently visiting. Cookies that match the domain of the current site, i.e. what's displayed in the browser's address bar, are referred to as first-party cookies. Similarly, cookies from domains other than the current site are referred to as third-party cookies. This isn't an absolute label but is relative to the user's context; the same cookie can be either first-party or third-party depending on which site the user is on at the time.

Three cookies being
    sent to a browser from different requests on the same page
Cookies may come from a variety of different domains on one page.

Continuing the example from above, let's say one of your blog posts has a picture of a particularly amazing cat in it and it's hosted at /blog/img/amazing-cat.png. Because it's such an amazing image, another person uses it directly on their site. If a visitor has been to your blog and has the promo_shown cookie, then when they view amazing-cat.png on the other person's site that cookie will be sent in that request for the image. This isn't particularly useful for anyone since promo_shown isn't used for anything on this other person's site, it's just adding that overhead to the request.

If that's an unintended effect, why would you want to do this? It's this mechanism that allows sites to maintain state when they are being used in a third-party context. For example, if you embed a YouTube video on your site then visitors will see a "Watch later" option in the player. If your visitor is already signed in to YouTube, that session is being made available in the embedded player by a third-party cookie—meaning that "Watch later" button will just save the video in one go rather than prompting them to sign in or having to navigate them away from your page and back over to YouTube.

The same cookie being
    sent in three different contexts
A cookie in a third-party context is sent when visiting different pages.

One of the cultural properties of the web is that it's tended to be open by default. This is part of what has made it possible for so many people to create their own content and apps there. However, this has also brought a number of security and privacy concerns. Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks rely on the fact that cookies are attached to any request to a given origin, no matter who initiates the request. For example, if you visit evil.example then it can trigger requests to your-blog.example, and your browser will happily attach the associated cookies. If your blog isn't careful with how it validates those requests then evil.example could trigger actions like deleting posts or adding their own content.

Users are also becoming more aware of how cookies can be used to track their activity across multiple sites. However until now there hasn't been a way to explicitly state your intent with the cookie. Your promo_shown cookie should only be sent in a first-party context, whereas a session cookie for a widget meant to be embedded on other sites is intentionally there for providing the signed-in state in a third-party context.

The introduction of the SameSite attribute (defined in RFC6265bis) allows you to declare if your cookie should be restricted to a first-party or same-site context. It's helpful to understand exactly what 'site' means here. The site is the combination of the domain suffix and the part of the domain just before it. For example, the domain is part of the site.

Key Term: If the user is on and requests an image from then that is a same-site request.

The public suffix list defines this, so it's not just top-level domains like .com but also includes services like That enables and to count as separate sites.

Key Term: If the user is on and requests an image from that's a cross-site request.

Introducing the SameSite attribute on a cookie provides three different ways to control this behaviour. You can choose to not specify the attribute, or you can use Strict or Lax to limit the cookie to same-site requests.

If you set SameSite=Strict this means your cookie will only be sent in a first-party context. In user terms, the cookie will only be sent if the site for the cookie matches the site currently shown in the browser's URL bar. So, if the promo_shown cookie is set as follows:

Set-Cookie: promo_shown=1; SameSite=Strict

When the user is on your site, then the cookie will be sent with the request as expected. However when following a link into your site, say from another site or via an email from a friend, on that initial request the cookie will not be sent. This is good where you have cookies relating to functionality that will always be behind an initial navigation, such as changing a password or making a purchase, but is too restrictive for promo_shown. If your reader follows the link into the site, they want the cookie sent so their preference can be applied.

That's where SameSite=Lax comes in by allowing the cookie to be sent with these top-level navigations. Let's revisit the cat article example from above where another site is referencing your content. They make use of your photo of the cat directly and provide a link through to your original article.

<p>Look at this amazing cat!</p>
<img src="https://blog.example/blog/img/amazing-cat.png" />
<p>Read the <a href="https://blog.example/blog/cat.html">article</a>.</p>

If the cookie has been set as so:

Set-Cookie: promo_shown=1; SameSite=Lax

When the reader is on the other person's blog the cookie will not be sent when the browser requests amazing-cat.png. However when the reader follows the link through to cat.html on your blog, that request will include the cookie. This makes Lax a good choice for cookies affecting the display of the site with Strict being useful for cookies related to actions your user is taking.

Caution: Neither Strict nor Lax are a silver bullet for your site security. Cookies are sent as part of the user's request and you should treat them the same as any other user input. That means sanitizing and validating the input. Never use a cookie to store data you consider a server-side secret.

Finally there is the option of not specifying the value which has previously been the way of implicitly stating that you want the cookie to be sent in all contexts. In the latest draft of RFC6265bis this is being made explicit by introducing a new value of SameSite=None. This means you can use None to clearly communicate you intentionally want the cookie sent in a third-party context.

Three cookies labelled None,
    Lax, or Strict depending on their context
Explicitly mark the context of a cookie as None, Lax, or Strict.

Objective: If you provide a service that other sites consume such as widgets, embedded content, affiliate programmes, advertising, or sign-in across multiple sites then you should use None to ensure your intent is clear.

Changes to the default behavior without SameSite

Chrome 76 introduces a new same-site-by-default-cookies flag. Setting this flag will shift the default treatment of cookies to apply SameSite=Lax if no other SameSite value is provided. This is a move towards providing a more secure default and one that makes the intended purpose of cookies clearer to users. If you want to delve into the details, check out Mike West's "Incrementally Better Cookies".

With this flag enabled in Chrome, both new and existing cookies without the SameSite attribute will be restricted to the same site the user is browsing. If you have cookies that need to be available in a third-party context, then you must declare that to the browser and the user by marking them as SameSite=None. You will want to apply this when setting new cookies and actively refresh existing cookies even if they are not approaching their expiry date.

If you rely on any services that provide third-party content on your site, you should also check with the provider that they are updating their services. You may need to update your dependencies or snippets to ensure that your site picks up the new behavior.

These changes are backwards-compatible with browsers that have correctly implemented earlier versions of the SameSite attribute, or just do not support it at all. By applying these changes to your cookies, you are making their intended use explicit rather than relying on the default behavior of the browser. Likewise, any clients that do not recognize SameSite=None as of yet should ignore it and carry on as if the attribute was not set.

Additionally in Chrome, if you also enable the cookies-without-same-site-must-be-secure flag then you must also specify SameSite=None cookies as Secure or they will be rejected. Note, this flag won't have any effect unless you also have same-site-by-default-cookies enabled.

Warning: At the time of writing, the network library on iOS and Mac incorrectly handles unknown SameSite values and will treat any unknown value (including None) as if it was SameSite=Strict, which affects Safari on Mac and browsers wrapping WebKit on iOS (Safari, Chrome, Firefox, and others). This should be fixed in an upcoming release and may be available in the Tech Preview now. You can track their progress in the WebKit Bugzilla #198181.

Behavior with same-site-by-default-cookies enabled

Set-Cookie: promo_shown=1
No attribute set

— If you send a cookie without any SameSite attribute specified.

Set-Cookie: promo_shown=1; SameSite=Lax
Default behavior applied

— Chrome will treat that cookie as if SameSite=Lax was specified.

Behavior with cookies-without-same-site-must-be-secure enabled

Set-Cookie: widget_session=abc123; SameSite=None

— Setting a cookie without Secure will be rejected.

Set-Cookie: widget_session=abc123; SameSite=None; Secure

— You must ensure that you pair SameSite=None with the Secure attribute.

Objective: These flags are intended to encourage more secure defaults, but you shouldn't rely on a browser's default behavior. Best practice is to always be explicit in stating the attributes so your intent is clear.

Designing for SameSite cookies

A core practice in software design is the Separation of Concerns which essentially states that each part of your system should have one clear purpose. This is more simply put in the Unix philosophy which says, "Make each program do one thing well". By adding the SameSite attribute to your cookies you are creating the distinction between first-party and third-party usage, but a third-party cookie can still be used in a first-party context. It might seem simpler to just have the single cookie, but now you have one component doing two jobs.

If you have one cookie that's providing functionality in both contexts, for example perhaps providing a user identifier for your main site and for an embeddable widget, then consider separating these into separate cookies. As browsers and users start to change how they accept and manage cookies providing this distinction makes your site more robust in scenarios where third-party cookies are blocked or cleared.

What should I do to enable SameSite today?

The majority of languages and libraries support the SameSite attribute for cookies, however the addition of SameSite=None is still relatively new which means that you may need to work around some of the standard behavior for now. These are documented in the SameSite examples repo on GitHub. If your particular use case is missing, please raise issue or submit a pull request with your solution.

Kind thanks for contributions and feedback from Lily Chen, Malte Ubl, Mike West, Rob Dodson, Tom Steiner, and Vivek Sekhar

Cookie hero image by Pille-Riin Priske on Unsplash

Last updated: Improve article